misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
Blog Article
Online access to case information for payments in find juvenile and domestic relations district courts. Cases might be searched using name, case number, or hearing date.
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It's also a perfectly-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is issue to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.
When the state court hearing the case reviews the law, he finds that, when it mentions large multi-tenant properties in a few context, it's actually very vague about whether the 90-working day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based over the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held on the ninety-day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
Note: Please fill any industry and Click on Search button, If you don't know the complete information please leave discipline blank.
The reported recovery can be used, at the most, for corroboration from the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be described as a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of incidence. The claimed memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as absolutely nothing was discovered as a result of these types of pointation. The place of event in addition to the place of throwing the dead body were already inside the knowledge of witnesses ahead of their pointation from the petitioners. Reliance is likewise placed on case legislation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it has been held through the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the conclusion or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may possibly interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it suitable towards the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or even the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified from the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Petitioner obtaining been declared an absconder in this case for over 1 in addition to a half year generates the apprehension that the petitioner may possibly avoid standing trial and hence delay the prosecution in the case. The material on record makes the case on the petitioner falls under two exceptions to your rule of grant of bail as mentioned above.
whether though granting promotion senior employees were considered for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more
Please note, When you are seeking a cost exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
In order to prove murder, there has to be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.
If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC could allow the employee get more info to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only accomplished If your employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence plus the petitioner company responded to the allegations as such they were well aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use to generally be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and potential hazard to local residents. In the long run, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, although observing the general development supports that electromagnetic fields have adverse effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should adopt the precautionary principle set out from the 1992 Rio Declaration around the Environment and Progress, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The shortage of full scientific certainty should not be used as a reason to prevent environmental degradation.